Nitasha Kaul incident: OCI cards being weaponised to silence critics, says IOCUSA
"If a democratic government is sure-footed about their policies and actions, they may not go down to this level to silence someone who participates in a policy debate"
“The recent denial of entry to India for Professor Nitasha Kaul from the UK is nothing short of weaponisation of OCI cards to silence the critics of the BJP government," said George Abraham, vice chair of the Indian Overseas Congress, USA (IOCUSA), in a press release shared on 2 March.
"This action that is contrary to the democratic traditions not only diminishes the value of the OCI card but also tarnishes the image of India as a beacon of freedom and liberty,” he added.
Last Sunday, 25 February, Nitasha Kaul, an Indian-origin UK-based professor at the University of Westminster, claimed that she was denied entry into India and was sent back to London from Bengaluru airport per "orders from Delhi". She is said to have stated that she was denied entry because of her opinions on “democratic and constitutional values”.
During a weekly media briefing, ministry of external affairs spokesperson Randir Jaiswal addressed the incident thus: “This UK national (Nitasha Kaul) came to India on February 22. As you know, the entry of foreign nationals into our country is a sovereign decision.”
The IOCUSA called Jaiswal's 'a surprising statement from a person who has been celebrating the diversity and achievements of India with the overseas Indian community until very recently'.
The BJP-led government has allegedly cancelled at least 102 OCI cards between 2014 and May 2023, according to the IOCUSA, including those of several journalists and academicians. In 2021, the Centre issued a notification introducing a series of new restrictions that curtailed the rights and liberties of OCI card holders, the statement notes.
According to the 2021 government notification, OCI card holders must secure a special permit to undertake any research, missionary, Tablighi or journalistic activities or to visit any area in India notified as protected, restricted or prohibited.
The IOC statement continues:
If a democratic government is sure-footed about their policies and actions, they may not go down to this level to silence someone who participates in a policy debate.
It is also ironic that this is the same government that takes pride in chastising foreign governments on their failures to protect the safety and religious freedom of its citizens abroad.
There is increasing evidence that global freedom is at risk where democratic governments are becoming increasingly authoritarian and more effective in curtailing the freedom of their citizens but also reaching out and beginning to control their expatriate population from expressing their disapproval of the governance or differing on their policy making that may be quickly interpreted as ‘anti-national’.
Unless the voters in India and the diaspora recognise this looming danger, free expression will become a thing of the past.
Therefore, IOCUSA appeals to the government of India to stop targeting Overseas Indians for expressing their opinions on the current state of affairs and instead focus on building a more robust relationship through meaningful dialogue for mutually beneficial interests.
Also Read: Silencing critics in the diaspora
Follow us on: Facebook, Twitter, Google News, Instagram
Join our official telegram channel (@nationalherald) and stay updated with the latest headlines