Bank mergers may benefit banks, not customers
The merger of 10 Public Sector Banks into four may make over 30,000 employees surplus. Such large job loss in the midst of economic slowdown is bound to lead to further job cuts in other sectors
The latest round of public sector bank (PSB) mergers — the third since 2017 — may help the merged banks cut their operational expenditure and improve their bottomline, but the initiative seems to have come at a wrong time.
The merger of 10 PSBs into four may make a total of well over 30,000 employees surplus if the experience of the merger of associate banks with SBI is any indication. Such large job losses in the midst of economic recession is bound to impact the overall market demand badly, leading to further job cuts in various other sectors.
It is too early to predict how such a scenario will help revive those merged PSBs — except for cutting into costs on account of employees’ salaries and rationalising physical infrastructure like merging local branches, ATMs, etc. Hopefully, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s wish that the merger would help the banks manage the capital more efficiently comes true.
The amalgamation is based on bad loans intensity and regional factors. Though it is not clear why some public sector banks, including Bank of India, Central Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank and Bank of Maharashtra among others, were left out of the mega-merger plan. The latter will continue to operate separately as before.
Going by the impact of the merger of SBI’s five small associate banks — State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, State Bank of Hyderabad, State Bank of Mysore, State Bank of Patiala, State Bank of Travancore — and Bharatiya Mahila Bank with the State Bank of India on April 01, 2017, there is no reason to believe that the latest bank merger will be painless, at least for their employees.
Within only two quarters of its consolidation, SBI witnessed a massive layoff in the staff strength as the country’s No.1 bank added 6,847 branches taking its overall headcount upto 23,423 branches as on June 2017.
Post-merger, SBI laid off about 10,584 employees within six months. The staff strength came down to 2,69,219 as in September 2017 compared to 2,79,803 as in March 2017.
This is despite the fact that SBI’s former chairperson Arundhati Bhattacharya made it clear, before consolidation, that SBI may relocate some branches of its associate banks but none of them will be shut down to assuage the staff. Also, Bhattacharya said: "No employee of the associate banks would be asked to leave," adding that "branches will also not be eliminated after the merger.”
The SBI, however, laid off 6,622 employees in Q1FY18 followed by another 3,962 employees in Q2FY18. This was quite natural, though. For instance, it did not make a business sense for SBI to operate two branches (the other belonging to its pre-merger associate bank) that might have been located as close as within 100 metres.
This was a big layoff compared to removal of just 3,197 employees recorded during the entire fiscal of 2015-16 (FY16). It may be further noted that a total of 11,382 employees took SBI’s retirement plan between April-September 2017.
Thanks to the lower number of employees, SBI's staff expense dropped to Rs 7,703 crore in Q2FY18 - from Rs 7,724 crore in the preceding quarter and Rs 8,300 crore in the corresponding period of the previous year.
However, following the merger, many old depositors with SBI’s associate bank branches shifted their accounts or opened new accounts with nearby private banks such as HDFC, ICICI, Axis, Kotak Mahindra, Yes Bank, IndusInd Bank, IDFC Bank and Bandhan Bank, known for their highly customer-friendly service.
Employees of merged PSBs seem to be quite helpless about the development. The All India Bank Employees Association (AIBEA) may have opposed to the government’s PSU Banks merger decision, but it will not alter the situation.
AIBEA general secretary C.H. Venkatachalam, had earlier said that there is no evidence that merger of banks would strengthen the banks or make it more efficient. He did not see any miracle happened to SBI after the merger of five associate banks with it.
"On the other hand, it has resulted in closure of branches, increase in bad loans, a reduction of staff and a reduction in business.”
According to Venkatachalam, the bad loans of five associate banks of SBI as on March 31, 2017 were about Rs 65,000 crore and that of SBI Rs 112,000 crore - totalling Rs 177,000 crore. After the merger, SBI's bad loans in 2018 increased to Rs 225,000 crore, he said. According to the 2017 Retail Banking Satisfaction Study by the global marketing firm JD Power, 46 percent of respondents whose banks went through a merger within the previous 12 months reported they would definitely switch banks.
An earlier study by the Deloitte Centre for Banking Solutions found that of those who did move to another lender, a surprising 36 percent said they did so for emotional reasons.
However, the consolidation of PSBs, especially those with high NPAs and slow growth, itself may not be a wrong idea. Nobody denies that India needs a well run banking system, offering customer friendly services, for its growth.
Unfortunately, the government and the PSB management are doing little to win customers’ hearts by changing the work culture. Compared to the business modules of private banks, the operational style of PSBs is simply obnoxious where depositors and small creditors are treated most shabbily. Personal banking services are rare.
New generation of customers are increasingly moving towards private banks where they find more at home. According to the latest RBI annual report, PSB accounts are also more fraud prone than their private sector counterparts. The amount involved in bank frauds has gone up by a whopping 73.8 per cent.
More than consolidation, PSBs need a cultural change to attract businesses, which have multiplied over the recent times in terms of options and offerings, and win over the sentiments of customers. PSB mergers without a cultural shift will be a futile exercise.