SC refuses to entertain pleas against UP’s ‘love jihad’ ordinance, asks petitioners to approach HC

The petitions challenge constitutional validity of the ordinance as violating Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution by empowering the State to suppress an individual’s personal liberty

Supreme Court of India (File photo)
Supreme Court of India (File photo)
user

NH Web Desk

The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the withdrawal of two writ petitions challenging the controversial Uttar Pradesh Ordinance on Unlawful Religious Conversions - commonly known as the 'love jihad' ordinance - with liberty to approach the High Court.

A bench headed by the Chief Justice of India SA Bobde observed that the Supreme Court was not inclined to deal with the matter when the High Court is already considering it.

"The High Court is already seized of the matter. We would like to have the benefit of the High Court's view on this as well," the CJI told the counsel for the petitioners, as per a report carried by Bar & Bench.

The counsel persuaded the bench to admit the petitions by submitting that the issue was important and that similar laws have been made in other states such as Madhya Pradesh. The counsel submitted that innocent persons were being arrested using the provisions of the law.

In response, the CJI said, "We are not denying the importance of the matter. We are on the question of jurisdiction".

The CJI also told the counsel that the apex court had dismissed last week a petition filed by the UP Government seeking transfer of the petitions pending in the High Court to the Supreme Court.


Following the brief exchange, the bench allowed the withdrawal of the petitions, granting liberty to them to approach the High Court.

The bench was considering the petitions filed by Vishal Thakre and People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL).

The Allahabad High Court is scheduled to hear the petitions challenging the controversial ordinance on February 24.

The petitions challenge the constitutional validity of the recently passed UP Ordinance as violating Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution by empowering the State to suppress an individual's personal liberty and impinge upon an individual's right to freedom of choice and right to freedom of religion.

Follow us on: Facebook, Twitter, Google News, Instagram 

Join our official telegram channel (@nationalherald) and stay updated with the latest headlines