SC dismisses plea on further directing SEBI on Adani–Hindenburg controversy

Earlier the court had also dismissed a review petition filed against its earlier verdict, refusing to form any SIT or group of experts to conduct a further investigation

The Adani-Hindenburg controversy is far from dead (representative image: NH)
i
user

IANS

The Supreme Court has upheld an order passed by the apex court registry in August 2024, refusing to admit a lawyer’s application seeking direction to SEBI to submit its conclusive probe report into the Adani–Hindenburg controversy.

Advocate Vishal Tiwari had moved an appeal against the order passed by the Registrar on 5 August 2024.

Earlier on 15 July 2024, the top court had dismissed a review petition filed against its earlier verdict refusing to form any SIT or group of experts to conduct an investigation. After perusing the review petition, a bench headed by then CJI D.Y. Chandrachud said that there was no error apparent on the face of the matter.

“No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of,” added the Bench, also comprising justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.

In a detailed order passed on 3 January, the Supreme Court had said that reports prepared by third-party organisations such as the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) and Hindenburg Research cannot be regarded as "conclusive proof".

It had said that the reliance placed by PIL litigants on newspaper articles or reports by third-party organisations “does not inspire confidence” to question the comprehensive investigation undertaken by the SEBI.

The apex court said that the facts in the case did not warrant a transfer of investigation from the SEBI and asked the market regulator to take its investigation to a logical conclusion in accordance with the law.

The SC had also cautioned against the use of unverified and unrelated material in the filing of public interest litigations (PILs), adding that pleas lacking adequate research and relying on unverified and unrelated material tend to be "counterproductive."

However, it had asked the Central government to constructively consider the suggestions made by the expert panel headed by former apex court judge Justice A.M. Sapre. "The Government of India and SEBI will take any further actions as are necessary to strengthen the regulatory framework to protect investors and ensure the orderly functioning of the securities market," it said.

The apex court had asked SEBI and other investigative agencies of the Union government to probe into allegations of short selling resulting in loss of investors' value. It had noted that the SEBI has already finalised 22 out of 24 investigations relating to allegations against the Adani group of companies and in relation to the remaining two cases, the market regulator has sought information from foreign agencies and entities and will determine future course of action based on receipt of such information. However, the Supreme Court had said that these pending investigations should be completed “expeditiously within a period of three months”.

Follow us on: Facebook, Twitter, Google News, Instagram 

Join our official telegram channel (@nationalherald) and stay updated with the latest headlines