India's misplaced vaccination plan, policy and priority let down Indians and also the global poor

What the Government should have done is to place advance orders for vaccines, arrange bank credit for expanding capacity, fund expansion of public sector units and share Covaxin technology with all

Representative Image
Representative Image
user

Prabir Purkayastha

Our first concept of self-reliance came out of our struggle for independence. It meant developing the indigenous capacity of our people, institutions and industry against the colonial control of the economy. The second self-reliance – Modi’s slogan of Atmanirbhar Bharat – means only local manufacturing. Without the other elements of self-reliance, it has failed to deliver even the vaccines that we need so urgently today.

The first self-reliance broke the monopoly of multinational companies – Big Pharma – and gave us the generic pharmaceutical industry that made India the global pharmacy of the poor. Backed by the 1970 Indian Patent Act, the CSIR laboratories reverse-engineered the drugs. This is how the Indian public sector and other indigenous manufacturers developed the world’s biggest generic drug and vaccine manufacturing capacity.

The Modi version of Atmanirbhar Bharat has squandered all of that. Given India’s Covid-19 crisis, the Serum Institute of India, the largest vaccine manufacturer in the world, is unlikely to resume its vaccine supply before the end of the year to WHO’s Covax platform. According to UNICEF, Serum Institute is going to have a shortfall in its commitments by 180 million doses up to June and another 200 million by December. This is a disaster for all the countries that had banked on the Covax platform for their vaccines. Instead of boosting Indian vaccine manufacturing capability, Modi’s ‘atmanirbharata’ has signalled that India is not a good place to set up global manufacturing.

All the scientific inputs – barring those from sycophants – would have indicated a second wave. The need for rapid ramping up of vaccine production capacity should have been obvious to all and sundry. Instead, the Modi government declared victory over Covid-19 and went into battle to defeat the opposition in the state elections.

What should India have then done differently? It should have used about five months in which the numbers were low to build up hospitals, oxygen, other medical support systems and accelerated vaccine production. We have about 50 companies that can produce vaccines. With planning and support, India could have ramped up its vaccine production to not only provide vaccine to the people but also to other

Let us start with the two technologies for vaccine production that are already proven and for which we have ample indigenous capacity. The inactivated virus vaccines have been there for more than a hundred years. They still work. The ICMR-Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin, Sinovac’s Coronavac, Sinopharm’s BBIBP-CorV, are all examples of such inactivated virus vaccines.

The second technology platform is using a benign virus –usually an adenovirus vector – to carry a small part of the SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19. The well-known Covid-19 adenovirus vector vaccines are Oxford-AstraZeneca’s, manufactured in India by Serum Institute as Covishield, Gamaleya Institute’s Sputnik V, and Cansino’s Convidicea.

The inactivated virus technologies started in India in Haffkine Institute, Mumbai and have a history of almost 100 years in India. In 1893 Waldemar Haffkine, a student of Louis Pasteur, came to India and went on to found the Haffkine Institute in Mumbai. In 1932, Sahib Singh Sokhey became the first Indian director of the Institute. He developed it as a centre for advanced biotechnology, as well as for the production of vaccines.

The Haffkine Bio Pharmaceutical Corporation, a Maharashtra government undertaking, was spun out of the Haffkine Institute and is one of the largest suppliers of vaccines globally. It is this vaccine base that Serum Institute used. It stole scientific personnel from the Haffkine Institute, three of whom even ending up on its board.

The tragedy of Indian vaccine manufacturing has been that while it was built on the back of the public sector, once the private sector came up, it was systematically gutted. This is why even though there are seven public sector units in India, the procurement of vaccines for our public health programme is almost exclusively from the private sector. It is because of its history of vaccine manufacturing that India has a large vaccine production base. It produced 60 per cent of all vaccines that were sold in the world before the current Covid-19 pandemic. According to Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), India has 21 vaccine manufacturers and the combined licensed production capacity is around 8 billion doses per annum.

Apart from the inactivated virus vaccines, India also has a strong biologic base that can be used for vaccine production as well. There are more than 30 companies that have the necessary know-how and the capacity for manufacturing adenovirus-based vaccines such as the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine or the Gamaleya’s Sputnik V vaccine.

Apart from Oxford-AstraZeneca’s tie-up with Serum Institute, five Indian biologic companies have tied up with Gamaleya for producing 850 million doses of Sputnik V vaccines. Similarly, BiologicE has a tie-up with Johnson & Johnson for producing 400 million doses of its single-shot vaccine already approved in the US. Serum Institute also has an agreement with Novavax, US for producing one billion doses though the completion of its trials and approvals are still some months away.

With all this large capacity, why is India producing only 60-70 million doses per month? The biggest mistake that the Modi government made was in believing that it had defeated the epidemic and therefore had ample time to vaccinate the people. It believed that Serum Institute manufacturing 70-100 million doses and Bharat Biotech another 12.5 million doses per month was adequate. It would meet India’s needs and also export commitments. A back of the envelope calculation would have shown that at this rate, India would take about two and a half years to produce the two billion doses needed to vaccinate its target population. That too without considering exports. Not only would India be exposed to a third or a fourth wave at this pace, but it would also be completely out of the global vaccine market.


The Modi government chose to believe that it had defeated the epidemic. Therefore the slow pace of its vaccination programme would pose no problems. Nothing else explains why it did not take the obvious steps that all countries who have indigenous manufacturing capacity took: a)place advance orders, b) extend bank credit to vaccine manufacturers to help expand capacity, c) invest money from the exchequer in the existing public sector units d) share the indigenous Covaxin know-how with other vaccine manufacturers.

Instead, it placed an order for only 11 million doses on Serum Institute in early January. The additional 120 million doses came towards the end of March when the second wave had started and the numbers were rising rapidly. After strong public criticism, it has placed advanced orders on Serum Institute and Bharat Biotech and given them some money to expand their production.

How much would it have cost the Modi government to expand production rapidly? With an investment of Rs 3,000 crores, India could have created a capacity of one billion additional doses of vaccine capacity; with Rs 6,000 crore, two billion doses; with Rs 9,000 crore, three billion doses. We would then have vaccinated all our target population in 12 months and yet been a major global supplier. Instead of being looked upon as those who make promises, take the money and then renege on their contracts. This is what we have done to the 92 countries that we were contracted to supply vaccines to under WHO’s Covax programme.

(IPA Service)

Views are personal

Courtesy: People’s Democracy

Click here to join our official telegram channel (@nationalherald) and stay updated with the latest headlines