Can a book tell history of Ganga?

Despite its various limitations and drawbacks, Sudipta Sen’s book Gangais a valuable addition to literature on the Ganga, highlighting the history, culture of the holy river

Ganga (Social media)
Ganga (Social media)
user

Himanshu Thakkar

Panditaraja Jagannath, Mughal court poet extraordinaire, a scholar of Linguistics, poetics, and philosophy hounded by the Brahmin orthodoxy led by Hara Dikshita for marrying a Muslim woman, sought refuge on the steps of Banaras by the side of the Ganga. Forbidden to step into the water lest he pollute the river with his transgression, he was moved to compose his famous devotional eulogy of the Ganga, known as the Piyushalari. As he composed each verse, legend has it, the river rose step by step, and at the end of his recitation sweeps him and his devoted wife away.” This is one of the many fascinating stories that Sudipta Sen tells us in this remarkable book, a product of at least 12 years of labour of love.

Rivers are indeed storehouse of millions of such tales, and no book can do justice to all the tales a river has to tell. So one book can never be sufficient to be a history of a river, as the history of river would include the history of all the key interactions that a river has had with various living organisms and society. Not the least a river like Ganga.

The author says in his introductory chapter, “This books explores the evolution of this image of a cosmic river at the intersection of myth, history and ecology.” For a river like Ganga, this is a herculean task and it is difficult to judge how far the author succeeds in this exploration. But, he does not go far in defining the ecological parameters of the river.

The author starts his journey from Kali Gandaki river, the river older than even Himalayas: “Geologists have been fascinated by the Kali Gandaki and its tributaries because it is the only river that has retained its path through the Himalayan massif.” In the beginning of this journey itself, the author asks a pertinent question: “How did the Ganga come to assume such a central place in the civilization and culture of the Indian subcontinent?” He may well have asked another pertinent question there itself: if Ganga did assume such a central place in the civilization and culture of the subcontinent, why was the river allowed to degenerate into one of the most polluted and defiled places on earth, its situation worsening during the right wing rule of Vajpayee and Modi?

The author variously describes the river as “cosmic river”, “one of the most engineered spaces on the planet”, “immaculate and eternal deity of the flowing waters”, “a mundane river, repository of accumulated human misdeeds”, “the river of the last resort”, “refuge of the wretched of the earth”, “the iconic status”, “River of afterlife”, “a comfort for the dying”, “the metaphysical threshold”, “the most compassionate mother”, “resplendent necklace on the bosom of the earth”, among others. It reminds one of the 1000 names that Ganga has been given in Puranas.

A number of noteworthy scholarly books have come out in recent years on Ganga, and the book under review is certainly one of the useful additions. But we need lot more scholarly work on our rivers, before the amazing beauty of rivers desert the humanity forever.


Some serious limitations

For a book published in 2019, one expects the book to contain a reasonably accurate account of the key issues plaguing the river currently. But the book makes no detailed mention of plethora of hydropower projects and all the debates around them, the unsustainable sand mining, encroachments on the floodplain and river bed and even the historic 2013 Uttarakhand flood disaster, or climate change impacts already affecting the river.

The whole book is about a River. One expects the book to at least attempt to define the river along with a narrative about various dimensions of a river. The author falls in the familiar trip of using water and river interchangeably. On these scores, one is disappointed. The book may also have benefited from providing map of the Ganga basin to define the changing geographic contours during different eras.

The author makes a large number of inaccurate, wrong or misleading assertions. For example, he says Farakka barrage was “originally intended for irrigation and flood control,” which is not true, the basic objective of FB was to sustain navigability of Kolkata port. The book makes rather confused statement: “India has defended the viability of Farakka as a safeguard against excessive siltation that has progressively diminished the navigability of the river between Hugli and Allahabad.” As far as Farakka stands, Allahabad does not come in the picture at all and the stretch between Hugli and Allahabad have seen various adverse impacts.

Similarly, his contention that efforts between India and Bangladesh “have not been successful in reaching a mutually acceptable compromise” does not seem correct in view of the 1996 Ganges agreement that has survived 23 summers without major issues.

For a number of questionable statements, the author does not provide any source or reference, which is a rather disturbing weakness. For example, he states “Some scientists have sounded the alarm that the Tehri Dam added to the minor barrages in Bijnor, Narora and Kanpur, has so accelerated the siltation rate of the Ganga that its lifespan is limited to a meagre forty to fifty year.” The author neither names any source nor any scientists. Similarly, he says the Tehri debate “pitted engineers and technocrats against villagers, devout Hindus, hidden leftists and environmental militants.” He does not clarify source or who is means by environmental militants. He makes another factually wrong statement when he says, “The (Ganga Action) plan was officially withdrawn in 2000 and a post-mortem was done by the National River Conservation Authority.”

These are not light mistakes and let us hope the writer qualifies them or corrects them in the next editions.

The author may as well have noted that it was the BJP rule under PM AB Vajpayee when the Tehri Dam gates were closed rather secretively, without going through due process.

And that it was Congress rule when Prof GD Agarwal (also known as Swami Gyan Swarup Sanand) went on fast, and government negotiated with him and agreed to many of his demands, each time, he withdrawing fast, whereas under Modi, Prof Agarwal died during the very first fast as the Prime Minister had no time to responding to Prof Agarwal.

The claims of the claimed Ganga putras like the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, ministers Gadkaris and Uma Bhartis not withstanding, there is little dispute that their actions have done so much harm to the state of the river. As I write this, Swami Atmabodhanand broke his fast unto death for the Ganga on 194th day of his fast.

The songs and the tales

Right in the beginning of the book, the author mentions the notes from the seventh century Chinese traveler Xuanzang who saw at Ganga-Yamuna Prayag, “hundreds of men fasting for days before immersing themselves in the river for a last ritual bath before committing suicide by drowning.” The ritual was ultimately stopped by Mughal emperor Akbar, the author notes.

One is reminded by the author about “the songs and verses of the radical devotional ferment that swept across India of the late Sultanate period, led by figures such as Nanak, Raidas, Dadu and Kabir, all of whom questioned the blind following of prescriptive rituals in normative and orthodox forms of Hindu worship and piety.” Sen goes on to remind about Nanak recording in Adi Granth “about the folly of believing that simply bathing in the Ganga makes one pure”. And about Kabir talking in his famous language of “enigma and paradox” when he says purity is an attitude and state of mind, else the same water that flows in the roadside nala also flows in Ganga, but the former is not even worthy of being touched. The author says, “Decades before India’s official independence, the Ganga had already secured its place as the national river”, referring to Poet Iqbal’s Song of India “Sare Jahan se Achha”, written in Lahore in 1903.

At one stage, the author asks a pertinent question that Ganga herself possibly asked Bhagiratha: “And then where would she go to cleanse herself of such accumulated poison?” As Bhagiratha reportedly replied to Ganga, she possibly does not go to any new place to clean herself, if truly religious people of current day India, like Panditraja Jagannath and his wife from the story we started with were to stand up for the river. Today we have saints of Matri sadan, ecologists working on dolphins and turtles, activists working against dams, civil society working against unsustainable sand mining, pollution and environment flows.

Sudipta Sen’s book is a valuable addition to literature on Ganga, especially for the way in which it connects various faces of the river. There are a certain limitations, but despite that, the book is a keeper.

Follow us on: Facebook, Twitter, Google News, Instagram 

Join our official telegram channel (@nationalherald) and stay updated with the latest headlines