Entertainment

Delhi HC orders takedown of ‘vulgar’, ‘derogatory’ song linked to Honey Singh, Badshah

Court says track violates minimum standards of civility; directs Centre to remove all online versions

Delhi HC orders takedown of ‘vulgar’, ‘derogatory’ song linked to Honey Singh, Badshah
The matter has been listed for further hearing on 7 May.  

The Delhi High Court on 2 April directed the removal of a song allegedly linked to rappers Yo Yo Honey Singh and Badshah, observing that its content was “grossly vulgar, obscene and derogatory towards women”.

Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav said the court’s conscience was shaken “to its absolute core” after hearing the track and noted that it lacked any artistic or social value.

“The court finds that the song is grossly vulgar, obscene and derogatory towards women… lyrics are not only disrespectful and offensive but also ex facie dehumanising,” the judge said.

The court added that allowing such content on platforms accessible to minors cannot be justified under the guise of artistic freedom or free speech.

It further observed that the song was in complete disregard of minimum standards of civility.

Directions issued

The court directed Honey Singh, Badshah and any other person claiming rights over the song or its versions to take it down from online platforms.

Published: undefined

It also asked the Centre to issue directions for removing all URLs of the song flagged by the petitioner.

The matter has been listed for further hearing on 7 May.

Petition and claims

The directions came on a plea filed by the Hindu Shakti Dal, which alleged that the song, reportedly released around 2006 under the collaboration “Mafia Mundeer”, contained objectionable and offensive lyrics.

The petitioner said the song has been widely circulated on social media, garnering millions of views.

During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that although both rappers have denied involvement, Honey Singh had performed parts of the track at a concert in Delhi, which revived controversy over its origin.

Free speech vs regulation

The court said such content cannot remain on public platforms, particularly when accessible to younger audiences.

It emphasised that freedom of expression does not extend to material that is “grossly derogatory” and demeaning.

The petition also sought a public apology from the artists, citing their influence and reach among audiences.

Further proceedings in the matter are scheduled for 7 May.

Published: undefined

Follow us on: Facebook, Twitter, Google News, Instagram 

Join our official telegram channel (@nationalherald) and stay updated with the latest headlines

Published: undefined