Defending Electoral Bonds introduced by the Modi Government to enable anonymous donations to political parties from India and abroad, Attorney General K.K. Venugopal representing the Union Government told the Supreme Court that voters do not have any right to know ‘ where the money comes from’.
Constitutional Law expert Gautam Bhatia responded with the following tweet:
Published: undefined
Bhatia underlined the importance of the Supreme Court judgment expected tomorrow and tweeted,
Published: undefined
An immediate riposte also came from RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj, who tweeted:
Published: undefined
The Supreme Court reserved the judgment on a batch of petitions that prayed for declaring the bonds unconstitutional and grant an immediate interim stay. It is likely to be pronounced tomorrow, on Friday.
The Attorney General pleaded that the Electoral Bonds, opposed by the Election Commission of India when it was introduced in 2017 and before the Supreme Court, were part of a ‘ policy experiment’ and the court should not interfere in a policy matter. And if at all the court decided to examine the scheme, he argued, it should be done only after the election.
The petitioners had pointed out that 95% of the bonds had benefitted the ruling party, that the bonds being sold only by select branches of State Bank of India and that too during short and specific windows, the Government would always know the identity of the buyers and could always influence them. Pointing out two such windows opened last month in March and then again in April, during the ongoing election, the petitioners prayed for an immediate stay on the sale of bonds.
This is what the AG said at the Supreme Court during his submission spread over two days, Wednesday and Thursday:
Published: undefined
Follow us on: Facebook, Twitter, Google News, Instagram
Join our official telegram channel (@nationalherald) and stay updated with the latest headlines
Published: undefined